Whereas Teets was off responsibility on the time of the incident, Schuetz was not. Beaverton police Sgt. Kevin MacDonald stated by failing to arrest Teets, Schuetz “prevented the investigation from occurring.” Because of the incident that “terrorized” a household, Teets was later charged with second-degree legal mischief and second-degree disorderly conduct. Forest Grove police officers then requested the Beaverton Police Division to research Schuetz’s involvement in November.
Whereas Teets was positioned on administrative desk responsibility throughout investigations, Schuetz is presently on paid administrative go away—regardless of being indicted on legal costs, in line with Forest Grove Police officers. The investigations proceed per a lawsuit filed by Mirella Castaneda, one of many house’s residents, who believes that her home was focused “due to her private and political views.” When reached for a remark relating to the arrests, Castaneda famous that the arrest itself doesn’t resolve the problem at hand.
“I’m glad that persons are lastly asking the questions that should be requested,” Castaneda instructed the Portland Tribune. “Hopefully because of this individuals care sufficient to understand how their regulation enforcement departments are literally conducting enterprise, and ensuring that they’re doing it the appropriate method.”
In response to the Portland Tribune, Teets was reported to be “extremely intoxicated” through the Oct. 31 incident and the responding officer didn’t activate their body-worn digicam regardless of division coverage. In response to a Washington County Sheriff’s Workplace memo, Teets didn’t even acknowledge his colleagues and “squared up” in a combating stance when first approached by them. Investigations solely started after the incident was reported to a supervisor by one other officer on name.
In response to Castaneda’s lawsuit, responding officers didn’t even examine Teets for weapons. She wasn’t even instructed Teets was a police officer, The Washington Post reported. It was solely when she googled his title that she realized the person who harassed her household was a police officer close by. Her attorneys argue that this lack of knowledge, the failure to doc potential political motives, and the officers’ unwillingness to activate physique cameras have to be investigated.
“The therapy of Ms. Castaneda as a second-class citizen based mostly on her political viewpoint by the investigating officers added insult to harm, and additional compounded the emotional trauma she and her household had skilled by the hands of Officer Teets,” her lawyer stated.
Whereas Castaneda has not gotten the solutions she wants, she hopes that higher coverage, actions, and procedures will observe this case.
“Hopefully justice is served on this case, however greater than something, I hope this can be a probability for the police to be extra clear sooner or later,” Castaneda instructed the Portland Tribune. “Transparency and accountability is admittedly what individuals need from their police division.”
The case itself has raised questions on how the therapy of regulation enforcement officers differs from civilians in legal circumstances. The truth that an off-duty officer was pushed house as an alternative of to the police division after harassing a household is past understanding. Teets’ actions weren’t solely inappropriate as an officer, however as a human on the whole. Had the flag represented one thing else, the scenario might need been completely different. Sadly, such incidents involving the Black Lives Matter flag are far too widespread. In multiple incidents, people have focused houses and harassed households outdoors of which the flag has been displayed. These people have confronted costs starting from hate crimes to legal costs. Law enforcement officials shouldn’t stroll free or be given particular therapy for terrorizing a household or caving in to their fragile egos triggered by actions to carry them accountable.