In late February 2021, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism reported1 that Pfizer was demanding international locations put up sovereign property as collateral for anticipated vaccine damage lawsuits ensuing from its COVID-19 inoculation. Whereas at the very least two international locations, Argentina and Brazil, initially rejected the calls for, calling them abusive, many others accepted Pfizer’s phrases from the beginning.
Public Citizen has now reviewed and revealed the key contracts2,3 between Pfizer and Albania, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Dominican Republic, the European Fee, Peru, the U.S. and the U.Ok. These contracts reveal nations have handed over unprecedented energy to Pfizer. In nearly all eventualities, Pfizer’s pursuits come first.
Pfizer Is Calling the Photographs
Public Citizen factors out six methods by which nations are permitting Pfizer to name the photographs. For instance, Albania, Brazil and Colombia have handed over unilateral authority to the corporate for the supply schedule and different key choices. As reported by Public Citizen:4
“As a situation to coming into into the settlement, the Colombian authorities is required to ‘exhibit, in a way passable to Suppliers, that Suppliers and their associates could have sufficient safety, as decided in Suppliers’ sole discretion’ … from legal responsibility claims.
Colombia is required to certify to Pfizer the worth of the contingent obligations (i.e., potential future legal responsibility), and to begin appropriating funds to cowl the contingent obligations, in accordance with a contribution program.”
Pfizer additionally maintains tight management over vaccine provides, and dictates who can purchase their vaccine, when, and who can provide and obtain vaccine donations. If there are shortages, Pfizer decides which international locations get precedence.
Bypassing Pfizer could be pricey. For instance, if Brazil have been to just accept vaccine donations from one other nation with out Pfizer’s approval, the corporate can terminate the contract and pressure Brazil to pay the total prize for all remaining contracted doses. In the meantime, Pfizer incurs no penalty if its supply is late, even when it is so late that the photographs are now not wanted.
Some international locations, together with Brazil, Chile, Colombia, the Dominican Republic and Peru, additionally ended up agreeing to Pfizer’s demand to place up sovereign property as collateral for vaccine damage lawsuits, together with financial institution reserves, navy bases and embassy buildings.
In brief, theses governments are guaranteeing Pfizer might be compensated for any bills ensuing from damage lawsuits in opposition to it, so the corporate will not lose a dime if its COVID shot injures individuals — even when these accidents are the results of negligent firm practices, fraud or malice!
On the identical time, authorities purchasers should acknowledge that the effectiveness and security of the photographs are utterly unknown. That is the last word company maleficence, utilizing their leverage to pressure the kill shot down these international locations’ throats and avoiding any private duty for damages.
Secret Arbitration
The contracts additionally dictate how contractual disputes might be settled. As reported by Public Citizen:5
“What occurs if the UK can not resolve a contractual dispute with Pfizer? A secret panel of three non-public arbitrators — not a U.Ok courtroom — is empowered beneath the contract to make the ultimate choice. The arbitration is carried out beneath the Guidelines of Arbitration of the Worldwide Chamber of Commerce (ICC). Each events are required to maintain the whole lot secret:
‘The Events conform to preserve confidential the existence of the arbitration, the arbitral proceedings, the submissions made by the Events and the selections made by the arbitral tribunal, together with its awards, besides as required by Legislation and to the extent not already within the public area.’
The Albania draft contract and Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Dominican Republic, and Peru agreements require the governments to go additional, with contractual disputes topic to ICC arbitration making use of New York regulation. Whereas ICC arbitration involving states shouldn’t be unusual, disputes involving high-income international locations and/or prescribed drugs seem like comparatively uncommon …
Personal arbitration displays an imbalance of energy. It permits pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer to bypass home authorized processes. This consolidates company energy and undermines the rule of regulation.”
Pfizer Secured Mental Property Rights
Amazingly, the contracts not solely safe Pfizer’s mental property rights, however ought to Pfizer be discovered responsible of stealing the mental property rights of others, a number of the contracts shift the duty away from Pfizer onto the federal government purchasers! What this implies is that Pfizer can steal the mental property of others with out consequence in at the very least 4 international locations.
“For instance, if one other vaccine maker sued Pfizer for patent infringement in Colombia, the contract requires the Colombian authorities to foot the invoice,” Public Citizen writes.6 “Pfizer additionally explicitly says that it doesn’t assure that its product doesn’t violate third-party IP, or that it wants further licenses.
Pfizer takes no duty in these contracts for its potential infringement of mental property. In a way, Pfizer has secured an IP waiver for itself. However internationally, Pfizer is combating related efforts to waive IP obstacles for all producers.”
Pfizer Given Proper to Silence Authorities
Maybe most egregious of all, a number of the contracts give Pfizer the fitting to muzzle authorities. In Brazil, authorities officers are prohibited from making “any public announcement in regards to the existence, subject material or phrases of [the] Settlement” with out the written consent of the corporate.
The gag order additionally contains commenting on the federal government’s relationship with Pfizer on the whole. Related nondisclosure provisions are included within the contracts with the European Fee and the U.S. authorities. The one distinction, Public Citizen notes, is that the nondisclosure guidelines apply to each events.
Pfizer Can Stop Use of Different Cures
Equally surprising, although, is that international locations are compelled to comply with by way of on their vaccine orders even when different medicine or remedies emerge that may stop, deal with or treatment COVID-19.7 Is it any surprise, then, that governments around the globe have suppressed the usage of medicine like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin?
If these medicine have been allowed for use and may very well be confirmed to work, the COVID injections could be utterly pointless, but governments are on the hook for a whole bunch of tens of millions of doses. Whereas COVID-19 vaccines are “free” to obtain within the U.S., they’re being paid for by taxpayer {dollars} at a price of $19.50 per dose. In Albania, the price of every dose is $12, and within the EU, $14.70.
Within the case of the worth disparity between the U.S. and the EU, Pfizer is alleged to have given a value break to the EU as a result of it financially supported the event of their COVID-19 vaccine.
Pfizer — Grasp of Catastrophe Profiteering
As famous Public Citizen, Pfizer is being allowed to revenue from this self-inflicted international catastrophe in unprecedented methods. In lots of cases, a nation’s legal guidelines won’t apply to Pfizer.
These secret contracts grant Pfizer whole management over its product and ensures full fee, no matter whether or not the photographs are wanted or usable, whereas concurrently eliminating all legal responsibility. In brief, Pfizer wins, it doesn’t matter what the result of the vaccination marketing campaign could be.
On the identical time, Pfizer can also be controlling media by way of its promoting {dollars}. As you have in all probability realized by now, media corporations in most cases won’t report on something which may jeopardize the income of its advertisers.
As illustrated within the brief video above, it could not be extra apparent that Pfizer is bankrolling the media, which in flip will refuse to chew the hand that feeds it. You possibly can see the huge spectrum of media programming being sponsored by Pfizer, together with “Nightline,” “Making a Distinction,” “CNN Tonight,” “Early Begin,” “Erin Burnett Out Entrance,” “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” “CBS Sports activities,” “Meet the Press,” “CBS This Morning” and “60 Minutes.”
Pfizer Research Exhibits Elevated Mortality
The phrases of those contracts are all of the extra disturbing when you think about how harmful the Pfizer shot is popping out to be. No surprise the corporate refused to just accept any legal responsibility.
As proven within the video above, Episode 3 in “The False Narrative Takedown Collection”8 by Steve Kirsch, Pfizer’s personal Part 3 six-month trial9 confirmed the photographs elevated all-cause mortality. Extra individuals really died within the therapy group than within the placebo group.
In line with Pfizer’s personal knowledge, one COVID demise per 20,000 totally vaccinated people is prevented. Meaning 10,000 lives are saved if 200 million are totally vaccinated.
However what number of lives are misplaced from the photographs? That is the opposite facet of the equation that merely calls for to be analyzed earlier than any governmental authority can decide as as to whether the mass vaccination marketing campaign is of profit or not.
Right here, we discover that Pfizer’s knowledge10 present the photographs are literally killing greater than they save. To take a look at this info your self, click on on “Supplementary Materials” on the right-hand facet of the paper, then, beside Supplementary Appendix, click on on dietary supplements/261159 and scroll right down to web page 12, Desk S4.
Within the vaccine group, 15 died; within the placebo group 14 died. Two individuals died from COVID-19 within the placebo group, whereas just one died from COVID pneumonia within the vaccine group. That is the way you get a internet false optimistic impression — one life is spared from COVID. Nevertheless, the all-cause mortality was really larger within the vaccine group (15, in comparison with 14).
So, whereas the photographs saved one individual from dying from COVID, in addition they killed one further individual. So, the web impact is nil. There isn’t any mortality profit in any respect. Different investigations utilizing totally different knowledge strongly counsel the web impact is profoundly unfavourable, and the photographs are doing FAR extra hurt than good.
We Face Looming Vaccine-Induced Public Well being Disaster
For this, Kirsch cites a paper11 by Dr. Bart Classen, revealed within the August 2021 concern of the journal Traits in Inside Medication. Classen factors out that Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen are all utilizing a “dangerously deceptive” scientific trial design. The issue is that they are all utilizing a surrogate endpoint for well being, specifically “extreme infections with COVID-19.”
Illness particular major endpoints are now not utilized in many fields of medication, for the truth that it will probably disguise issues. If an individual dies from the therapy or is severely injured by it, even when the therapy helped block the development of the illness they’re being handled for, the tip end result remains to be a unfavourable one.
Because of this, the suitable endpoint that needs to be used is all-cause mortality and morbidity. When Classen reexamined the scientific trial knowledge from all three producers utilizing all-cause extreme morbidity because the endpoint, a disturbing image emerged.
As defined by Classen in his paper, “US COVID-19 Vaccines Confirmed to Trigger Extra Hurt than Good Based mostly on Pivotal Scientific Trial Information Analyzed Utilizing the Correct Scientific Endpoint, ‘All Trigger Extreme Morbidity'”:12
“‘All-cause extreme morbidity’ within the therapy group and management group was calculated by including all extreme occasions reported within the scientific trials. Extreme occasions included each extreme infections with COVID-19 and all different extreme opposed occasions within the therapy arm and management arm respectively.
This evaluation provides discount in extreme COVID-19 infections the identical weight as opposed occasions of equal severity. Outcomes show that not one of the vaccines present a well being profit and all pivotal trials present a statistically vital enhance in ‘all-cause extreme morbidity’ within the vaccinated group in comparison with the placebo group.
The Moderna immunized group suffered 3,042 extra extreme occasions than the management group. The Pfizer knowledge was grossly incomplete however knowledge offered confirmed the vaccination group suffered 90 extra extreme occasions than the management group, when solely together with ‘unsolicited’ opposed occasions.
The Janssen immunized group suffered 264 extra extreme occasions than the management group. These findings distinction the producers’ inappropriate surrogate endpoints:
Janssen claims that their vaccine prevents 6 circumstances of extreme COVID-19 requiring medical consideration out of 19,630 immunized; Pfizer claims their vaccine prevents 8 circumstances of extreme COVID-19 out of 21,720 immunized; Moderna claims its vaccine prevents 30 circumstances of extreme COVID-19 out of 15,210 immunized.
Based mostly on this knowledge it’s all however a certainty that mass COVID-19 immunization is hurting the well being of the inhabitants on the whole. Scientific rules dictate that the mass immunization with COVID-19 vaccines should be halted instantly as a result of we face a looming vaccine induced public well being disaster.”
To make the above numbers extra clear and apparent, listed below are the prevention stats in percentages:
- Pfizer 0.00036%
- Moderna 0.00125%
- Janssen 0.00030%
CDC Claims COVID Photographs Decrease All-Trigger Mortality
Regardless of all of that, the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention now claims Individuals “vaccinated” in opposition to COVID-19 have decrease all-cause mortality charges.13 As reported by Forbes:14
“Partially and totally vaccinated individuals died from non-coronavirus causes at a decrease price than their unvaccinated friends, in accordance with the examine,15 which checked out tens of millions of sufferers at seven U.S. well being organizations from December to July.
All three vaccines authorized by U.S. regulators have been tied to decrease non-COVID demise charges, although the distinction in mortality amongst individuals who took Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine was barely smaller than for recipients of Pfizer or Moderna’s vaccines …
This end result suggests the vaccines do not enhance a affected person’s danger of demise, which ‘reinforces the protection profile of at present authorized COVID-19 vaccines,’ the examine mentioned.”
FDA Approves Jab for Younger Youngsters
October 26, 2021, the FDA unanimously voted to grant emergency use approval of the COVID photographs for youngsters between the ages of 5 and 11.16 This regardless of acknowledging they do not know what the long-term danger to kids could be. As famous by one voting member, “We’re by no means going to find out about how secure the vaccine is till we begin giving it.”17
All we’ve at current is 2 Pfizer trials, one by which 5- to 11-year-olds have been adopted for 2 months and one other with simply six weeks of follow-up. Each have been too small to detect potential dangers reminiscent of myocarditis. That will not be studied till AFTER the shot is allowed for youngsters. As reported by The Defender:18
“Consultants raised issues over the dearth of security and efficacy knowledge introduced by Pfizer to be used of its COVID vaccine in youthful kids, they usually pointed to growing security indicators based mostly on reviews to the Vaccine Opposed Occasion Reporting System (VAERS). Additionally they questioned the necessity to vaccinate kids — whose danger of dying from COVID is “virtually nil” — in any respect.
In line with Dr. Meryl Nass, member of the Children’s Health Defense Scientific Advisory Panel, Pfizer as soon as once more didn’t use the entire kids who participated within the trial of their security examine.
‘Three thousand kids acquired Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, however solely 750 kids have been selectively included within the firm’s security evaluation,’ Nass mentioned.
‘Research within the 5-11 age group are basically the identical because the 12-15 group — in different phrases, equally temporary and unsatisfying, with insufficient security knowledge and efficacy knowledge, with no robust help for why any such immuno-bridging evaluation is ample … All critical opposed occasions have been thought-about unrelated to the vaccine’ …
Dr. Jessica Rose, viral immunologist and biologist, informed the panel EUA of organic brokers requires the existence of an emergency and the nonexistence of alternate therapy. ‘There isn’t any emergency and COVID-19 is exceedingly treatable,’ Rose mentioned.
In a peer-reviewed examine19 co-authored by Rose, myocarditis charges have been considerably larger in individuals 13 to 23 years previous inside eight weeks of the COVID vaccine rollout. In 12- to15-year-olds, Rose mentioned, reported circumstances of myocarditis have been 19 instances larger than background charges …
Rose mentioned tens of 1000’s of reviews have been submitted to VAERS for youngsters ages 0 to 18. Rose defined: ‘On this age group, 60 kids have died — 23 of them have been lower than 2 years previous. It’s disturbing to notice that ‘product administered to affected person of inappropriate age’ was filed 5,510 instances on this age group. Two kids have been inappropriately injected, presumably by a skilled medical skilled, and subsequently died.'”
Through the assembly, Dr. Cody Meissner famous we do not know whether or not the shot is secure for this age group, and the chance of COVID is extraordinarily low. If the shot is allowed, mandates will doubtless comply with, which might be “dangerous.”
Brownstone Institute can also be objecting to the authorization. In an October 20, 2021, article,20 Paul Elias Alexander, Ph.D., a former assistant professor of evidence-based medication and analysis strategies, known as the plan to vaccinate younger kids “completely reckless” and “harmful based mostly on lack of security knowledge and poor analysis methodology.”
In the meantime, knowledge present not a single youngster has died from COVID-19 who didn’t have a critical underlying well being situation. Alexander evaluations lots of that knowledge in his article.
Staggering Conflicts of Curiosity
If you take a look at the roster of the FDA’s committee members21 who reviewed and voted to authorize the Pfizer shot for youngsters as younger as 5, the unanimous “sure” vote turns into much less of a thriller. As reported by Nationwide File,22 they’ve staggering conflicts of curiosity. Members embrace:
|
Gregg Sylvester — A former vp of Pfizer Vaccines |
|
Arnold S. Monto — A paid Pfizer marketing consultant |
|
Archana Chatterjee — A latest Pfizer analysis grant recipient |
|
Myron Levine — Mentor to Raphael Simon, senior director of vaccine analysis and growth at Pfizer |
|
James Hidreth — President of Meharry Medical School, which administers Pfizer vaccines |
|
Geeta Swamy — Chair of the Impartial Information Monitoring Committee for the Pfizer Group B Streptococcus Vaccine Program |
|
Steven Pergam — Proudly photographed taking a Pfizer vaccine |
|
A number of people who find themselves already on the document supporting coronavirus vaccines for youngsters, together with Ofer Levy, Jay Portnoy and Melinda Wharton |
Along with that, former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb is at present on Pfizer’s board of administrators.
FDA Buries Information on Critically Injured Youngsters
With these photographs now being pushed on younger kids, it is extra crucial than ever to know how knowledge are being massaged and manipulated to help the continuing lunacy. Of explicit concern is proof that the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration is burying knowledge on kids who have been significantly injured within the vaccine trials. As reported by Aaron Siri on Substack:23
“Pfizer’s scientific trial for youngsters aged 12-15 included just one,131 kids who have been vaccinated and at the very least a kind of kids suffered a devastating, life-altering damage which, regardless of incontrovertible proof and the cries of each the sufferer and her mother and father, has not been appropriately acknowledged by Pfizer or the FDA.
Placing apart that one critical damage in a small trial ought to alone elevate blaring alarm bells, one should ask: what different critical opposed occasions have been hidden and ignored by regulators?”
Siri tells the story of 12-year-old Maddie de Garay, who alongside together with her two brothers have been enrolled by her mother and father in Pfizer’s scientific trial. That call has modified the lives of all the household, presumably endlessly. Inside 24 hours of her second dose, Maddie suffered crippling ache and systemic accidents.
Maddie is now wheelchair-bound and requires a feeding tube. Pfizer’s principal investigator initially claimed Maddie’s accidents have been unrelated to the shot and handled her as a psychological affected person. Finally, her damage was listed as “useful stomach ache” in Pfizer’s report back to the FDA.
“For a virus that hardly ever harms kids, the necessity to guarantee security of the Covid-19 vaccine is excessive. A examine with just one,131 kids is underpowered. It won’t decide up something however the most typical opposed occasions.
If what Maddie suffered will happen in 1/1,000 kids, that will end in 75,000 kids on this nation struggling this critical damage. If it occurs 1/10,000 kids, that’s 7,500 struggling this critical damage.
It may very well be that the treatment is worse than the illness. However that may solely be identified if there’s a correctly powered (a.ok.a., sized) scientific trial with kids,” Siri writes, including that:
“Worldwide scientists have declared that ‘inadequately powered research ought to themselves be thought-about a breach of moral requirements.’24 And not using a scientific trial of ample measurement that evaluations all potential opposed occasions, reminiscent of that skilled by Maddie, for a ample length, this probably catastrophic end result won’t be recognized previous to authorization or licensure …
The actual lesson shouldn’t be that pharmaceutical corporations, or the FDA ought to act higher or do a greater job. That simply will not all the time be the case. The actual lesson is that civil and particular person rights ought to by no means be contingent upon a medical process. By no means.
Preserving these rights to decide on whether or not to get a medical product, with none authorities coercion, is the ultimate and supreme safeguard.
Eradicating that proper ends in harmful authoritarianism as a result of simply because the FDA won’t admit to Maddie’s critical damage after having promoted this vaccine, politicians that mandate the vaccine won’t need to later admit a mistake by repealing the mandate.”
FDA Sued to Entry COVID Jab Trial Information
We’re now able the place it is near-impossible for a lot of to refuse the COVID jab, and if injured, they can not sue anybody for damages. Including insult to damage, we do not even have entry to all the info governments are supposedly counting on to mandate these hazardous merchandise.
To handle this final level, a company known as Public Well being and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) is now suing25 the FDA after the company refused to launch the info on which it based mostly its choice to approve Comirnaty.26
The FDA denied the PHMPT request for expedited processing of its Freedom of Data Act (FOIA) request on the idea that no “imminent risk to the life or bodily security of a person” existed. Per the criticism:27
“… in an effort to make sure that the FDA acts in furtherance of its dedication to transparency, PHMPT seeks to acquire the info and knowledge relied upon by the FDA to license the Pfizer Vaccine.
The significance of releasing to the general public this info can also be acknowledged beneath federal regulation which offers that: ‘After a license has been issued, the next knowledge and knowledge within the organic product file are instantly out there for public disclosure except extraordinary circumstances are proven: (1) All security and effectiveness knowledge and knowledge. (2) A protocol for a check or examine …'”
‘Simply Say No’ to the COVID Shot
Whereas U.S. authorities are doing their greatest to cover incriminating knowledge and manipulating the remainder to point out some kind of profit, widespread sense, medical info and out there knowledge all level in the other way. It is crystal clear to me that kids don’t want the COVID shot, as their danger of great COVID-19 an infection and demise is nearly nonexistent.
Then again, kids are fairly prone to be significantly injured by these injections. The explanation you are not getting the reality from the media is defined by Dr. Peter McCullough within the video above. In brief, it is a deliberate propaganda marketing campaign — “the promotion of false info by the individuals in cost.”
In line with McCullough, anybody beneath the age of fifty has a lower than 1% probability of a nasty end result if they arrive down with COVID-19. “Why would you’re taking the vaccine?” he asks. “My recommendation,” he says, “is simply say no to this [shot], particularly younger people who find themselves not in danger.”
